Jennifer Lawrence Reveals Why She Declined an Intimacy Coordinator on Latest Project Die My Love
Jennifer Lawrence has joined the growing list of performers who express doubts about the essential need of on-set intimacy professionals, revealing she chose not to use their services while working on her new movie her upcoming film.
Understanding the Role of Intimacy Coordinators
Intimacy coordinators were introduced following the #MeToo era to ensure the safety and ease of actors during scenes involving partial undress and sexual content. However, numerous prominent performers including Gwyneth Paltrow and Sean Bean have expressed reservations about their involvement, with several claiming they disrupt creative flow.
Lawrence's Personal Experience
Speaking during the popular culture podcast, while discussing her new film where she plays a character experiencing mental health challenges, Lawrence commented: "We chose not to use such a professional, or perhaps we did have one but didn't make use of their services... I felt entirely secure with Robert."
She continued: "He is not pervy and deeply devoted to Suki Waterhouse. Our conversations mostly revolved around family life and personal connections. There was never awkward tension or questions about personal boundaries."
"If there was the slightest indication of unease, I definitely would have insisted on an intimacy coordinator. Many male actors get upset if you don't reciprocate their advances, and subsequently the negative treatment starts. He was completely different."
Professional Validation and Continuing Discussion
Earlier this week, entertainment database IMDb formally acknowledged intimacy coordinators as a separate category, together with multiple additional crew positions including choreography, catering, and puppetry. Before this, they were categorized as "miscellaneous staff" instead of having their specific credit.
Despite this recognition, these professionals still encounter public discussion implying they aren't necessarily required standards, with well-known actors rejecting their involvement. Jennifer's viewpoint echoes that of another prominent actress, who earlier shared she refused intimacy coordination while filming alongside Jon Hamm on their television series.
Aniston's Experience
"He proved to be extremely respectful – I mean each action, every cut, 'Are you OK?" she remembered. "It was also very choreographed. That's the benefit of working with skilled editors, appropriate music. So, minimal preparation is needed."
Aniston continued, "Production suggested, 'Professional verification if you're comfortable,' and I responded, 'Please, this is awkward enough!' We're experienced professionals – we can handle this. And we had Mimi on set."
Other Examples and Professional Response
Although including multiple sequences of sexual activity and frequent nudity, the award-winning film – Sean Baker's Oscar-winning project about a sex worker and a Russian oligarch's son – filmed without an intimacy coordinator.
Mikey Madison explained she and fellow actor Mark Eydelshteyn "concluded it would be preferable to keep it small."
"My character is a professional in adult entertainment, and I had researched the director's work and recognized his dedication to realism. I was mentally prepared for it. As an performer, I treated it as professional work."
Her comments provoked significant backlash from industry professionals, mirroring the response to Gwyneth Paltrow's recent comments, who earlier this year shared that filming her forthcoming project her latest film marked her initial experience with the relatively new profession, which she "did not know existed."
Paltrow's Perspective
During filming about personal ease with a particular action alongside fellow actor her younger counterpart, the actress responded: "I belong to the era where you get naked, you assume position, the camera's on."
Paltrow added that she and Chalamet then told the coordinator: "We think we're comfortable. You can step back.' I don't know how it is for emerging actors, but... if someone is directing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an artist, extremely restricted by that."
Professional Reaction
Following these comments, industry executive Caroline Hollick described them as "concerning" and highlighted that the majority of those opposing these professionals have established careers to command their own power and protection on film sets.
"Occasionally an actor makes comments about whether they appreciate on-set professionals or not," said Hollick. "The actress stated she grew up in a period when people in Hollywood 'took our kit off and got on with it'. As a established actress in Hollywood performing alongside a man considerably junior than her, although likely he is chill, I found it somewhat concerning statement."
Male Perspective
The veteran actor, meanwhile, shared that he believes the primary responsibility during heterosexual sex scenes falls on the male performer, instead of a external professional.
"In my experience, you assume duty as the man to ensure the female co-star is comfortable, you discuss it completely," he said. "You communicate, '{OK, I'm going to make contact there if that's agreeable'. It's extremely careful but appears like it's happening naturally, which is hopefully what convincing acting looks like."